Compare
Four ways teams refine today, and what changes.
No competitor tables and no invented numbers: a plain comparison of the working methods teams already use with a Scopeleaf session.
Refinement meetings
A recurring hour for the whole team; questions are asked out loud, answers land in someone's notes, and the ticket is written afterwards from memory.
- The draft is the meetingEveryone edits one live document with attribution. There is nothing to write up afterwards.
- Questions are asked by the draftOptional GrillMe explores the draft with questions and recommendations; everyone can contribute to the shared conversation.
- Decisions are visibleReview the shared conversation and individual changes. An answer is not automatically an approved document change.
Jira templates
A template guarantees headings, not content. Empty sections ship with 'TBD', and nobody is asked the questions that would fill them.
- Templates plus a reviewerFeature, Dev story, Bug, Spike, Lean and Blank templates, with an AI review that points at the empty or vague parts.
- Inline, reviewable changesSuggestions show the exact change in place; approve or reject in one click.
- Export to where the ticket livesMarkdown, HTML or Word; bring the reviewed document into your delivery workflow.
ChatGPT copy-paste
One person pastes the idea into a chat, gets a polished text back, and pastes it into the tracker. The team never saw the questions, and the provenance is lost.
- The team is in the loopGuests join free and see every suggestion; the AI proposes, humans decide.
- Provenance stays visibleThe header shows human, AI and unreviewed shares; approving AI text marks it reviewed.
- No document history in a chatClosing a session keeps it and ends access; the host can reopen it. Nothing is deleted because nobody used it, and deleting is a separate step. Exported files and provider copies follow separate retention rules.
Confluence PRDs
A long page written alone, reviewed in comments over a week, out of date by the time engineering reads it.
- One focused hour instead of a weekDraft, GrillMe and review in a single session with the people who decide.
- Right-sized depthChoose Lean, Standard or Full context for GrillMe; a lean ticket and a delivery brief need different questions.
- A ticket, not a pageThe Refined v2 is structured for engineering: outcome, scope, acceptance criteria, edge cases, open questions.
Have questions?
Does Scopeleaf replace Jira or Confluence?
No. It is where the ticket gets decided. Export the result to the tool your team already uses; the session stays with you until you delete it.
Do we need the whole team in the session?
No. One host and the people who can answer the questions. Guests join free with the host's link and can follow the interview live.
What does it cost compared with a meeting?
One host subscription: Starter at €19 or Business at €49 a month, excl. VAT. Guests join free, and the AI steps they start spend the host's points.
Try it on your next feature.
From €19/month per host · Guests join free. Prices exclude VAT.